<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Strategy on lgovea</title>
    <link>https://lgovea.com/categories/strategy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Strategy on lgovea</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>2026 lgovea</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:04:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://lgovea.com/categories/strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Strategy Is the Logic of Why We Win</title>
      <link>https://lgovea.com/posts/strategy-is-the-logic-of-why-we-win/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:04:59 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lgovea.com/posts/strategy-is-the-logic-of-why-we-win/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As the strategy definition process for next year begins, and as a current student in the Stanford LEAD program, I find myself reflecting on lessons from Professors William Barnett and Jesper Sørensen in their Strategic Leadership course. One simple definition has stayed with me: strategy is the logic that explains why we might win.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This definition took me a while to internalize. For much of my career, the strategy we received looked more like a to-do list: cut costs by 10%, invest more in marketing, grow market share by 10%, add 10 new team members, and close 100 projects by year-end. We were told the what, but rarely the why. When people on the execution side receive only a list of actions, they are forced to connect the dots themselves—and that makes it far more likely they will take steps we never intended.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
